Olaf Rempel wrote: > > When doing so, we should split the *big* isdn4k package in some smaller > pieces, eg.: isdn4k, devel, isdnlog, vbox, x-stuff and maybe capi > > (at least the X stuff should go into a different package)
I agree. Do you have time to do a first try? placing it in contrib for 2.2 would be a start, and when it's proved, we can simply move it to official with just a rebuild. If we make sure it's upgradeable, we can forward port the splitted package to 3.0 as well, if it can do something useful in a 2.6.x setting. If not we need to obsolete the one in 3.0 with something useful. :) c -- Christian Haugan Toldnes Trustix Developer _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
