On 22.06.2006, at 17:08, Ariën Huisken wrote: >>>> Somthing like pre-announcement would be more than fine, because >>>> it's >>>> more than 1 month since you mentioned TSL 3.0.5... I like TSL, >>>> so I'd >>>> really like to know what's the current status of TSL (hopping >>>> that I'm >>>> not the only one). >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>> >>> You are most certainly not the only one - or rather, I'm also >>> here, so >>> that makes at least two people wanting to know the current status of >>> TSL. :o) >> >> Three. 8o) > > Four or more.. five. > > ... > We are currently testing Ubuntu and if the migration from 2.2 to 3.x > requires a complete reinstall, we (and our customers) will switch over > to Ubuntu. I just migrated a few stand alone servers from SuSE to TSL, started the move when the early 3.0 beta could be shown to customers (how to do upgrades), > > I will miss TSL that's for sure (snif). and I can't back away from that claim that it is the easiest to maintain, if I have my configs tucked away in the conf.d folders and so on ...
so I hope I don't have to change procedures here .. and I don't care for the installer, since I would be prepared to do it from rescue and rpm -i into a folder the basic install ... it is about running it, changing config, upgrading ... (the usual stuff) just my two cents ... (I just got a few openbsd servers in my hand, and since I appreciate that openbsd has pkg_* tools (it didn't have that when I started searching for a secure server environment), I still believe that the openbsd way wouldn't fit into the workflow that I'm now used to, serving different server needs every day with the same machines. .... ) matthias _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
