ehlo, Daniel Meyer writes:
> Hi Thomas, > >> Does your opinion == the general opinion, or is it "just" a matter of >> the TSL people having chosen a path that you don't like? > > What TSL people? :-) > The comodo people kicked out the cloud-dev team (the "community people"), > they did their stunts with free/nonfree versions, bloated the distribution > with 3.0.. 3.0 was never announced to be "stable"... i also disagree with some choice in 3.0, as evms (complicate things make peepz sad) inclusion of *any* X things (well, i admit i hate X, but including it in mainstream will cause dependancy sticking to it and i hate to have to install full X just coz a graphic installer need it) > > The (good old) TSL people left comodo. > > Bottom line is: i can only speak for myself, so "your opinion == the > general opinion" is not true until a significant amount of other people > agree with me here on that list. And well, just take a look at Christians > postings... > > Danny > i think that the *good old people* can still contribute and help out the community :) dont think that doing that mean helping the "bad" comodo guys, coz even if i release a patch somewhere else they can still take it and use it... this is the free software world :) btw..i dont think the new tsl team are bad guys :) they just had been put in a bad situation caused by a bad commercial decision... also... all nice distributions are user contributed.. so why not tsl ?? why sit down and just wait the release to come out ? do something! cheers Fremen _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
