But if it's not expected to have any effect on IETF outputs, why bother presenting it at TSVAREA to the IETF?
Oh wait, QUIC isn't in an internet-draft, so it won't have any effect on IETF outputs. We don't need IPR disclosures. We're good. Lloyd Wood http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/dtn/http-dtn has previously presented to TSVAREA to zero effect. ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Brim [[email protected]] Sent: 08 July 2013 13:37 To: Spencer Dawkins; ietfdbh Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Draft agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting uploaded On 07/07/13 23:39, "Spencer Dawkins" <[email protected]> allegedly wrote: >The notes I've read in this thread have been very helpful to me. Thank >you for sharing. > >At this point, the only thing I'm obsessing about is that we get decent >IPR declarations when IPR exists. Our BCPs define a contribution broadly >enough to include presentations. The *IRTF* now has an IPR policy that's >roughly equivalent to the IETF's policy; if people can't talk about >research without disclosing, we should have the same stance for >presentations on engineering topics. Spencer, we don't need IPR disclosures if a contribution is not expected to affect IETF outputs. "Participants who realize that the IPR will be or has been incorporated into a submission to be published in an Internet Draft, or is seriously being discussed in a working group, are strongly encouraged to make at least a preliminary disclosure."
