还是snapshot靠谱…… On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Justin Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > TUNA mirrors 被 硬raid+LVM+qcow2+virtio+btrfs 坑惨之后，在没有条件上裸硬盘的情况下， ZFS 和 btrfs > 都不好，所以我决定退回到 ext4。 > > 这样做的代价就是失去 snapshot，因此各类 rsync 都需要考虑同步过程的中间状态问题。 > 目前 rsync 的参数表是： > > -aHvh --no-o --no-g --stats --delay-updates --delete --delete-after > --safe-links --timeout=120 --contimeout=120 > > 有几个问题我不太确定： > > --exclude-from 和 --exclude 是否可以同时使用？因为需要考虑 --exclude .~tmp~ 这样的东西 > 在有 --delay-updates 的情况下，debian 的 two-stage rsync 是否还有必要？[1] 中有讨论，结论似乎是 > single stage 就够了，那么为什么 debian 官方仍然要求使用 two-stage rsync? > > p.s. cc 给 ustc 的同学求意见。 > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/12/msg00357.html > > -- > Open Source, Open Mind > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TUNA 主邮件列表" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- Regards, Aron Xu -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TUNA 主邮件列表" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
