Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's some more proposed cleanup. Can people look at 1,2, and 3
> in the cleanup proposal and vote please:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/proposals/package-cleanup.html
+1 for numbers 1 and 2. For 3, I am also +1 on the condition that we
get rid of the silly sub-package notion. All of the service-speific
utility code that I've glanced over is most appropriately housed in
the same package as its supported service. I say this because Java's
packages are designed to provide accessibility restrictions first, and
organize code second. (I'm laying odds that some of the utility
classes should possibly not even have public accessibility.)
Daniel Rall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
