"Kasper Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Be a little more critical about what util classes that ends up in
> > > > org.apache.turbine.util in the future.
> >
> > What critieria do you suggest?
> >
> I just want people thinking about perhaps putting classes in Commons, thats
> where everybody can benefit for them, and we have one less class to worry
> about.
> I really think that the number of classes that a project has in propotional
> to amount of time you have use to get a good overview of the application.
> Allmost everybody is overwhelmed with the size of turbine allready, off
> course this should all change to the better when we get all the refactoring
> done.
I agree. However, I do not have commit to the Commons. I am also
overwhelmed by the size of the Commons repository--it's a bit of a
mess because it has like 10 projects living in the same CVS module. I
find that extremely annoying and hard to use, especially with the
current overloaded state of cvs.apache.org.
Daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
