Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> Some have told us that the Turbine documentation is a little on the slim
> side too!
There is a bit more than on Cocoon though.
> > I am intimately familiar with
> > the architecture of Cocoon and Avalon, so I would be able to offer suggestions
> > that will provide a smooth migration path to something that is embeddable.
>
> You mean embedding Cocoon in Turbine?
Or the other way around. In the beginning, I will persue the path of least
resistance. If it is easier to embed Turbine, I will go that route. If it
is easier to embed Cocoon, then you get the idea. I need to wrap my head
around the way Turbine works, so that will take me a few days.
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
