Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 7/2/01 2:30 PM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Or the other way around. In the beginning, I will persue the path of least
> > resistance. If it is easier to embed Turbine, I will go that route. If it
> > is easier to embed Cocoon, then you get the idea. I need to wrap my head
> > around the way Turbine works, so that will take me a few days.
>
> What aspect of Turbine did you want to use with cocoon? The view
> portion? I assume cocoon already has it's own db connection code
> that comes from avalon.
I was thinking the File upload and ACL code for starters. The MaybeUpload jar
lives up to its name, but I was also thinking of creating a DataSourceComponent
that wrapped the Turbine connection code.
> I would look at HEAD. It will be changing over the next few days,
> but it's a glimpse of what's to come.
I was going to use the TDK to get started. I will look at what is in CVS as
well.
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature