Jon Stevens wrote:
> 
> on 7/2/01 11:30 AM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Or the other way around.  In the beginning, I will persue the path of least
> > resistance.  If it is easier to embed Turbine, I will go that route.  If it
> > is easier to embed Cocoon, then you get the idea.  I need to wrap my head
> > around the way Turbine works, so that will take me a few days.
> 
> Berin,
> 
> I think that you will find that merging the two together will be difficult
> because both of them attempt to control the URI space.
> 
> If you take a few steps back and try to realize what Cocoon is actually
> doing along side with what Turbine is actually doing, you will see that
> Cocoon will play nicely with Turbine as the "View" portion of Turbine.
> 
> I just saw your other posting come by stating that you would like to use the
> Services. In that case, you don't need anything more than to use the
> TurbineConfig object to initialize Turbine with the right
> TurbineResources.properties file and then go from there by using the
> Services directly within your other code.

:)  That is what I am trying to determine.

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to