On Thursday, February 7, 2002, at 08:29 AM, Gonzalo A. Diethelm wrote:
> Finally, since there seem to be several, pretty different proposals > floating > around, how about this: I recommit my proposal under o.a.t.s.gonzo, an > Eric > does likewise under o.a.t.s.eric. We leave a SINGLE file under o.a.t.s, > the empty interface SecurityManager. Jason chooses whatever > implementation > he wants. Opinions? I think that this would be defeating the goal of CVS. If your proposals are that different then I would suggest creating different CVS branches and putting the code in the "correct" place in both of them. I don't think that the namespace should be cluttered and used to differentiate your proposals like this. -Kurt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
