> Thick-headed?  I think not.  8^)  Seems like a very sneaky
> way to see if I really know what I'm talking about, and if
> I can explain it clearly.  8^)

Got me there... ;-)

> It's also going to take me a while to put a blow by blow
> example together, but I'll give it a shot later today or
> maybe over the weekend.

Great!

Everyone, I'm about to commit a couple of changes to my proposal;
basically, the introduction of a Scope concept (preliminary name,
can be changed later) and the use of newInstance() to avoid tying
TurbineSecurityManager to specific classes (they are still
hard-coded, but now as Strings, not imports).

This is the last I will be able to contribute to this thread
in terms of coding until the 18th. I'll try to keep on top of
the mail messages. I do have high hopes that we will be able
to home into a simple and very configurable default implementation
of a security system, so everyone please keep contributing to
the discussion!

One more thing: anyone volunteers for writing an implementation
of T2's security system using my proposal? (yeah, right).

> -Eric


-- 
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to