> Thick-headed? I think not. 8^) Seems like a very sneaky > way to see if I really know what I'm talking about, and if > I can explain it clearly. 8^)
Got me there... ;-) > It's also going to take me a while to put a blow by blow > example together, but I'll give it a shot later today or > maybe over the weekend. Great! Everyone, I'm about to commit a couple of changes to my proposal; basically, the introduction of a Scope concept (preliminary name, can be changed later) and the use of newInstance() to avoid tying TurbineSecurityManager to specific classes (they are still hard-coded, but now as Strings, not imports). This is the last I will be able to contribute to this thread in terms of coding until the 18th. I'll try to keep on top of the mail messages. I do have high hopes that we will be able to home into a simple and very configurable default implementation of a security system, so everyone please keep contributing to the discussion! One more thing: anyone volunteers for writing an implementation of T2's security system using my proposal? (yeah, right). > -Eric -- Gonzalo A. Diethelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
