Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>on 2002/12/8 2:37 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What about Avalon logging? It's better suited for server-side logging,
>> and has its own abstractions that make it possible to use as
>> implementations log4j, logkit or whatever.
>I prefer that we use commons-logging.
>I'm -1 on Avalon logging as the dependency simply because I like to have the
>choice as to which logging package I want to use.
I agree on this. commons-logging is a "commons" package. I'd prefer to
use as little from other projects (where we have no influence and
vote) as possible.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
