On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Compared to Avalon, Turbine is really lightweight and simple. I'll try > to keep it that way. If we can use synergies with Avalon, fine. If > not, well, if you need all the features of Avalon, why not use Avalon > in the first place?
What are you talking about? Avalon isn't a webapp framework. > We do not try to be an end-all, be-all solution which replaces all other > web-application frameworks. We do not need to be "best-of-brand" in > every category. We're not even trying to compete. :-) What are we trying to do then? Build a half-assed framework? -Kurt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
