On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:00, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Nothing in Turbine 2.x is clear. Period. > > Hearing this from a main contributor of Code for T2.x, x < 2 is > basically telling "I did screw up and then I left to let others pick > up the pieces". > > So, please do so.
I was not a main contributor to 2.x. I had nothing to do with the way the request life cycle was handled, the security service or the high level of coupling that occurred naturally. I cleaned it up for release, added some services and the code generation for Torque but the architecture is not mine I did however, for better or worse, decouple fulcrum and torque, and I gutted 2.x into something a lot more comprehensible which is t3. But always expect to throw the first one away and what is present in Summit is what I expect to be a long term solution. > Regards > Henning -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
