May be we should rename Turbine 3. It seems to me that it causes too much confusion and it gives the wrong idea that turbine development is stalled. -- Humberto
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: what is the status of turbine-3 ? > > > T3 is probably not going to ever be released. It was built > in large part to > support Scarab. Many of the concepts pioneered in T3 where > cool, but better > solutions like Avalon where found, and are being back ported > into T2 (like > the avalonization of components). > > eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicholas Ide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: what is the status of turbine-3 ? > > > > I don't see much developer activity on turbine-3 recorded in: > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/turbine-3/maven-reports.html > > Is turbine-3 likely to ever be released? > Is turbine-3 "working" well enough for the developers to use it > in their projects but nobody has the time to make an > "official" release? > > Or, is turbine-3 a dead project and all activity is on turbine-2? > (Some substantial performance enhancements were made to DynamicURI > in the turbine-3 branch. If turbine-3 is dead, these should be > migrated to turbine-2.3.) > > -Nick Ide > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
