Correct, however I might drop the " but we encourage serious users take part in its development" line, as we really want people to develope in 2.x! Eric
-----Original Message----- From: Chris K Chew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 12:08 PM To: Turbine Developers List Subject: RE: what is the status of turbine-3 ? What if we changed the index page text to read: "Turbine 3.0 is an experimental development tree unscheduled for release. It is not recommended for use in a production environment, but we encourage serious users take part in its development." Currently it uses phrases like "currently unscheduled" and "not yet recommended" which really do cater to the idea that it will be eventually become the future Turbine. Unless I am mistaken, the future of turbine is either in the avalonization of 2.x, or some non-existent new branch...right? Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Humberto Hernandez Torres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: what is the status of turbine-3 ? > > > May be we should rename Turbine 3. It seems to me that it causes too much > confusion and it gives the wrong idea that turbine development is stalled. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
