I like the idea of doing a better job of "hiding" it. Turbine 3 should
mainly be of interest for the turbine developers who may get some cool ideas
from it.
--
  Humberto

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quinton McCombs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:00 AM
> To: 'Turbine Developers List'
> Subject: RE: what is the status of turbine-3 ?
> 
> 
> I agree with this idea.  At the very least we could do a better job of
> "hiding" it on the web site.  I would like to hear the 
> opinions of some
> of the people using it though...
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> Quinton McCombs
> NequalsOne - HealthCare marketing tools
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.NequalsOne.com 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Humberto Hernandez Torres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 10:58 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: what is the status of turbine-3 ?
> > 
> > 
> > May be we should rename Turbine 3. It seems to me that it 
> > causes too much confusion and it gives the wrong idea that 
> > turbine development is stalled.
> > --
> >   Humberto
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:20 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: what is the status of turbine-3 ?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > T3 is probably not going to ever be released.  It was built
> > > in large part to
> > > support Scarab.  Many of the concepts pioneered in T3 where 
> > > cool, but better
> > > solutions like Avalon where found, and are being back ported 
> > > into T2 (like
> > > the avalonization of components).
> > > 
> > > eric
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nicholas Ide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:14 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: what is the status of turbine-3 ?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't see much developer activity on turbine-3 recorded in: 
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/turbine-3/maven-reports.html
> > > 
> > > Is turbine-3 likely to ever be released?
> > > Is turbine-3 "working" well enough for the developers to use it
> > > in their projects but nobody has the time to make an 
> > > "official" release?
> > > 
> > > Or, is turbine-3 a dead project and all activity is on turbine-2? 
> > > (Some substantial performance enhancements were made to 
> > DynamicURI in 
> > > the turbine-3 branch.  If turbine-3 is dead, these should 
> > be migrated 
> > > to turbine-2.3.)
> > > 
> > > -Nick Ide
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to