I would be willing to participate in a Turbine PMC. We have many
projects that use and rely upon different versions of Turbine and would
like to continue to contribute and see the project continue.
Scott Eade wrote:
There are once again rumblings in Jakarta about the number of
sub-projects and sub-sub-projects, their varying levels of
activity/inactivity and whether or not the existing PMC is able to
perform its obligations with respect to oversight.
While progress on Turbine may be slow, I believe that there are enough
people that rely on it and want to see it actively maintained to enable
us to put together a proposal to become a top level project (TLP)
consisting of Turbine (including META) and Fulcrum.
What I would like to know is whether or not you would make yourself
available to participate in a new Turbine Project Management Committee
(PMC). The PMC is ultimately responsible to the board of the ASF in
terms of overseeing the project and ensuring that it fits within the
goals and meets the requirements of the foundation.
What do you think? Do you think we have the numbers to go TLP? Would
you be interested in being part of the initial PMC?
Let's discuss this here before I go to the trouble of putting a proposal
together.
--
=====================================================================
Jeffrey D. Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wisconsin, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
