> That looks good if we can't do it with Torque, but it seems we should 
> have all/most of the code to do similar things in Torque already without 
> adding another Jar to the equation? Or I could be wrong - does anyone 
> know the code well enough to say for sure?
> 
> Also, I don't want to have to write additional mappings for all the 
> classes and I want primitive data in elements not attributes, which 
> would mean using a tweaked Castor XML - there didn't seem to be any 
> mention of this being configurable.

Try http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/betwixt/

Age



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to