I would recommend the head of 2.x tree over 2.1, but better yet try using the code in the standalone torque repo. And there is no need to have webmacro for torque, are you using it for your application screens?
john mcnally Colm McCartan wrote: > > Hello all, > > Can't quite figure this out from archives or docs in CVS. Given that I'm > getting nowhere fast with postgres and the fact that I will have to > trace problems down into the torque/peers source I am trying to build > the tdk jar from CVS. Questions: > > - Is 2.2 the right thing to do or am I better sticking to trying to > build 2.1, given that I'm deploying to postgres on linux (I'm getting > lots of little build problems with this. I would also like to be able to > contribute any fixes I can find and I assume it is best to this to 2.2? > > - How is this built? Using the build.xml in the base directory from CVS > there are problems caused by the lack of the servlet.jar in lib. Also, I > notice that while checks are made for optional packages like Castor this > does appear to be done for webmacro - even with the webmacro jar in > place I am getting screeds of compile errors. Should I be using dist.sh? > The build.xml under build? Is the source totally independent of 2.1? > > I would really appreciate any responses as I have been bashing my head > against postgres since before Xmas. > > colm > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
