John McNally wrote:
> I would recommend the head of 2.x tree over 2.1, but better yet try > using the code in the standalone torque repo. And there is no need to > have webmacro for torque, are you using it for your application screens? The standalone torque repo - excuse my ignorance but does this include a full version of turbine? How does it differ from the turbine-2 repo? I am not using webmacro at all - I went through and binned a lot of the webmacro-related files in places like turbine/modules/actions. Also python stuff etc. Perhaps I messed up the inital build which I know should detect which optional jars are present - but am I right in thinking that it doesn't do this test for webmacro? Also John - did you happen to notice my mail about postgres stuff yesterday? I seem to be running up against a lot of small build errors for postgres. For instance, as well as the missing torque templates, the unix.vm template is not properly populated with a user parameter when calling createdb and dropdb. In a previous post I also mentioned the bad foreign key references that are generated when an alias to the turbine_user table is specified in the torque schema. In connection with a previous poster mistakenly capitalising idbroker in their torque schema, it is worth noting that it is shown capitalised in the example at the top of: http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2/howto/torque-schema-ref.html Cheers, colm -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
