Hi Colin.
We meet again in another round of the LDAP conversation!  8^)

On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 12:53  PM, Colin Chalmers wrote:

> This was a proposal from a colleague of mine how to change the schema 
> for
> use with Turbine.
>
> I have also looked into the Ldap matter on several occasions; I usually 
> try
> to  pick it up when I think the pressure at work is easing off  then
> unfortunaely it seems to kick in again sucking up all my time. Now I 
> feel
> like a broken down record player saying each time that I'll look into 
> it :-(

I feel I should mention that my own broken record ("Yep.  Broken.  
Volunteers?") is not intended to lay a guilt trip on you specifically.  
I know how the pressure at work never really eases off.  Each time I 
call for LDAP volunteers I'm hoping that the latest interested party 
will have pressure from work that compels them to make LDAP work.  
Someday I may get to it myself, but only if we find a customer for whom 
LDAP is a show-stopper requirement.  Until then, I'll just keep calling 
for volunteers.


> I have looked at the code and made some small changes to get it to 
> work, yes
> I got *authenticaion* working.

That would be such a great place to start.  Please send in the fixes!


> The question I think has to asked, what do we want to achieve here? Pure
> authentication in Ldap and the rest (of the turbine roles etc) in the 
> DB? Or
> replicate what we have now working in a DB in Ldap? Or....?
>
> If it's the first then the present code almost achieves this, if it's 
> the
> latter then there's more work required. And how does this fit in with 
> the
> security in V3?
>
> If there was a discussion on this with a clear outcome I would gladly 
> fix
> the code to achieve that aim. Unfortunately that would have to be after 
> my
> hols, I'm off to Mexico on Wednesday for 3.5 weeks :-))


I agree that these items need discussing, but sometimes its easier to 
see what needs to be fixed once there is something in place that works 
to some degree.  And it might be easier to get volunteers to add a 
little more to something that works.  But right now the LDAP stuff is 
just broken.  Please send in your fixes before you take your holiday, if 
you can find the time.

If you'll contribute your fixes I'll see how it works here and add 
documentation.  Then we can take up the rest of the conversation when 
you return.

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to