People say it has a component model for building up websites, components are described in files, components can have actions, but most of the technical description talks about how it is different to struts.
What I want to know from Turbine people is when might you want to use Tapestry instead of Turbine, and why.
Alex
At 23:05 21/10/02, you wrote:
On that different mailinglist it is pretty well described (also by
Turbine people iirc). the list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the archives can be found on nagoya.apache.org
Mvgr,
Martin
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 21:25, Alex McLintock wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> On a different Apache mailing list there is some discussion about whether
> or not Tapestry ( http://tapestry.sourceforge.net/ ) should be allowed into
> Apache.
> Putting that argument aside... Tapestry has been described as another
> alternative to JSP, and potentially nearer to Turbine than to Struts.
>
> Has any experienced Turbine developers looked at Tapestry? How does it compare?
>
> Thanks
>
> Alex
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
Openweb Analysts Ltd, London.
Software For Complex Websites http://www.OWAL.co.uk/
Open Source Software Companies please register here http://www.OWAL.co.uk/oss_support/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
