On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 09:33, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> The question is: 
> 
> Are you still around here in the real sense of a developer and committer? 
> 
> or
> 
> Are you no longer a committer in any real sense?

Most definitely as you will soon find out once maven.apache.org is up
and running. This has been the plan for a long period of time. My
committment is to the Turbine project not to the 2.x codebase
specifically.

> At least I would be very grateful if you would finally decide what you
> want. I'm unhappy that you walk around @ irc calling me "a foe" and
> want to go "toe to toe" with me and "really give me a fight" but then
> barge in when finally someone wants to tackle the documentation
> problem of a project you don't really care any longer about.

Henning don't assume that you know what my intentions are. And if you
look far back I did not start the conflict that started between us. I
find you generally confrontational, devisive and tactless. I don't
consider you a foe, I essentially consider you a bad thing that has
happened to Turbine. I don't really think about you on a personal level.

If someone wants to make some docuementation then great. Write some
documentation. Like I said before: grand Turbine documentation projects
have been proposed before and not much has resulted. I'm not trying to
be a stick in the mud, just speaking from the perspective of being
around here for a while.

> So what will it be?
> 
> >1) Docbook is massive and for the most part it's overkill for the type
> [...]
> >2) If it is desired to support multiple formats that is fine but the
> [...]
> 
> Your objections have surely been noted by Chris and whoever will be on
> the documentation team. I personally will work there only as someone
> who gives his code knowledge to the team and I will go with whatever
> these guys decide to use. 

The primary discussions should be the organization of content. As I said
in the previous message anyone can write documentation in any format and
I will convert it. But before any great lengthly discussions occur the
users here should be presented with a view of what the future could be
like.

> 
> So even if you have any personal problems with me, please keep them
> aside and argue from an objective point of view.

As I've said before I don't care about you personally. I care about the
project.

> > anakia format has been around a long time and serves it's purpose well
> > and should remain the primary format.
> 
> Where is the "anakia" format documented, 

http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site-tags.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site-tags-example.html

Which has served many of the Jakarta sites. It's really not that
complicated.

> how can the docs team write
> docs in this format efficiently and what tools are available to work
> with this format. Into which formats can it be converted? Will you
> actively work with Chris and other potential doc writers or will you
> simply block everything that does not fit your grand vision?

I am not blocking the writing of documentation. Please, lets gather some
documentation before assembling the grand "Documentation Team". The
assembly of the content is far more important. What I'm afraid of is
discussion will center around the tool, a great deal of effort will be
exerted converting everything and then the effort will peter out. If the
documentation is created, the format found to be limiting then it is
very easy to convert it. It's just not practical to again go though a
conversion process when there is no addition content. It just doesn't
make sense.

> Why do you come rushing in with "This will not happen as long as I'm
> around", trying to block any possible progress while you publicly
> stated that you don't work with the current T2 code any longer?

I am not interested in the 2.x codebase but that doesn't mean I'm not
interested in users being able to run 2.x code and move toward a more
coherent component-based system like Avalon where true maintainability
is possible and for which there is a great body of literature to draw
from which is only a benefit to users.

> You said that you consider at least my work with the T2 code as
> "irrelevant" and think that everything I do on the current code base
> has already been done very much better in other projects (at least you
> said so in public on #turbine @ irc.werken.com) . So, why do you even
> bother to hang around here anymore?

I do believe that Turbine 2.x is largely irrelavant as a code base and
you are just replicating what's already been done. For what reason I'm
not entirely sure. I stick around because I do care about the users. As
my role draws to a close in getting maven.apache.org up and running my
desire to create a coherent application framework will return as my
primary concern. I have been very much undecided about where I would
like things like Plexus/Summit to land and that has been coloured
heavily by my interactions with the Board and my general feeling of how
things work at Jakarta. A great deal of conflict has either been
resolved or set aside and the Board sanctioned maven.apache.org so at
least as far as the future of Turbine is involved I am much more
hopeful.

Unlike you I am not going to make any assumptions and as I've stated
before I will fully disclose what I'm doing and give people the option.
Do I have opinions, of course. Do I have vision, most certainly. But I
definitely don't like way you do things which seem to be a great deal of
change with no colloration in any of the known forums. You don't seem to
discuss anything in IRC and I never see any discussion before you drop
in a great deal of code change. I have often made swift changes to the
code base but there has always been some modicum of discussion on IRC.

Again, my interest in is the users, not you personally.

>       Regards
>               Henning
> 
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to