Jon wrote:
>For what it is worth, we *really* need to re-write the Peer stuff to not use
>Peer's. ;-) We (John, Frank and I) are kinda waiting on OPaL or Castor to be
>mature enough, but that hasn't seemed to happen yet. Castor definitely isn't
>there yet and OPaL is getting closer.
I think we've kinda hit a deadlock ( and people are busy making fortunes
). Folks are yelling for a 1.0 release
but (IMO) we've got things to clean-up first. Within the last week I
sent out a message to find out if we've finally agreed upon the new
Services stuff.
I didn't get a reply. I'm waiting on that before I move forward on the
scheduler and **I think** Scott said he's also waiting before moving
more on
OPL. I backed off on the admin stuff waiting for OPL...you get the idea.
With that said, are there any more ideas on the Service stuff?
I'll wait a couple days and if I don't hear from anyone. I'll
go back to the archives and get the last decisions on Service and make
the
changes. I'm going to also spend some time learning how OPL works so I
can see if we can start changing DB admin stuff to OPL.
Hopefully, we can start to move some things forward.
dave
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
