on 2/9/00 7:17 AM, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jon * wrote:
>
>> Actually yes. I just haven't had time to write it up yet. Essentially, my
>> feeling is that execute needs to be able to take an object. execute(Object
>> obj). I need to explain this reason in detail, but just haven't had the time
>> yet.
>
> I agree on the execute(Object). But I think Brett is against it. I've
> been doing some
> work with Webmacro and want to make it available to Turbine via a
> Service. It would
> be nice to have the execute(Object)to pass the RunData object on to
> Webmacro.
Yes. Exactly my feeling as well and same reasoning. I want to do the same
with John's Freemarker stuff.
> As a side note: The solid integration of a scripting engine like
> (Webmacro/Freemarker) with
> Turbine will be the absoulute killer! The ONLY reservations I can see
> some folks having with
> Turbine is the HTML coding. That worked out with Webmacro/Freemarker,
> and you can turn the "pretty"
> stuff over to the page authors. At that point, why the HELL would you
> ever need to buy a Servlet
> Framework!
bingo. ;-)
> I'm starting to think that OPL is __KEY__ to finalizing the 1.0 version
> of Turbine.
That and well thought out and implemented Freemarker/Webmacro support.
-jon
--
Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation
Conference! <http://ApacheCon.Com/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
