jon * wrote:
> Actually yes. I just haven't had time to write it up yet. Essentially, my
> feeling is that execute needs to be able to take an object. execute(Object
> obj). I need to explain this reason in detail, but just haven't had the time
> yet.
I agree on the execute(Object). But I think Brett is against it. I've
been doing some
work with Webmacro and want to make it available to Turbine via a
Service. It would
be nice to have the execute(Object)to pass the RunData object on to
Webmacro.
As a side note: The solid integration of a scripting engine like
(Webmacro/Freemarker) with
Turbine will be the absoulute killer! The ONLY reservations I can see
some folks having with
Turbine is the HTML coding. That worked out with Webmacro/Freemarker,
and you can turn the "pretty"
stuff over to the page authors. At that point, why the HELL would you
ever need to buy a Servlet
Framework!
> Yep...I was feeling the same way. I *NEED* something like OPL badly before I
> can continue on the things that I want to work...
I'm starting to think that OPL is __KEY__ to finalizing the 1.0 version
of Turbine.
dave
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
