on 2/14/00 3:21 PM, Kevin A. Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So overall +1. However I think that between Turbine/Jakarta/Cocoon we
> need to decide on this. And perhaps put it within a 3rd CVS (avalon?).
> Jakarta is (or going to be) using the IBM log4j. We need to agree on a
> standard logger and put it within org.apache.java and share the same
> code. We are approaching this with Ant but need to take it to the next
> level.
Yes. I agree. There is a lot of confusion here regarding this logging
facility stuff. There are just WAY to many solutions for this one single
problem.
> Avalon is taking longer than I expected. Specifically because it is a
> lot of work and is revolutionary which is hard in the OSS world.
So is Turbine, right? ;-)
-jon
--
Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation
Conference! <http://ApacheCon.Com/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
