Re: [PATCH] Postgresql (long)

[Sean Legassick]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:32:24PM -0700, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> I agree that BasePeer shouldn't know about this stuff.  However, if it
> applies to 
> one database only, does it really belong in Turbine's database adapter
> code?

That's what the database adaptor code is for - see ignoreCaseInOrderBy()
for another example of a one product workaround (Interbase).

-- 
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]