On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 03:25:03PM -0400, Nissim wrote: > Does anyone else care to comment on this before I submit more patches? Will you handle incorporating John's improvements to BasePeer into your patches? In which case I will not worry about testing/committing them yet. -- Sean Legassick [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [PATCH] Postgresql (long) Sean Legassick
- Re: [PATCH] Postgresql (long) Daniel L. Rall
- Re: [PATCH] Postgresql (long) Sean Legassick
- Re: DB Daniel L. Rall
- Re: DB Sean Legassick
- Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolve... Nissim
- adding html related stuff to a business object... John McNally
- Re: adding html related stuff to a business ob... Sean Legassick
- Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolve... Sean Legassick
- Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolve... Nissim
- Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolve... Sean Legassick
- Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolve... Nissim
- Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolve... Sean Legassick
- [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, u... Nissim
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transaction... Nissim
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transaction... John McNally
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transaction... Sean Legassick
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transaction... Nissim
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transaction... Sean Legassick
- [PATH] SqlExpression Slawomir Gawin
- Re: [PATH] SqlExpression John McNally
