Sean Legassick wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:32:24PM -0700, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> > I agree that BasePeer shouldn't know about this stuff. However, if it
> > applies to
> > one database only, does it really belong in Turbine's database adapter
> > code?
>
> That's what the database adaptor code is for - see ignoreCaseInOrderBy()
> for another example of a one product workaround (Interbase).
I understand that, and am saying that it's yucky when every adapter must
stub out a method that is a workaround for or applies to only one
database.
I guess that it is still probably the best solution available...
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://collab.net/ | open source | do the right thing
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
