Sean Legassick wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:51:06AM -0700, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> > > As for the stack of U context, I totally agree. That same need arises
> > > in lots of applications. I ended up building basically the same thing
> > > into GEF (a direct-manipulation graphical editor application). Also,
> > > the joist framework (joist.tigris.org) maintains a "cancel-to" stack
> > > that is basically the same idea.
> >
> > Almost every web application I've ever built has had this feature--it
> > works quite nicely in practice.
>
> [moved to turbine list from scarab-dev as it's more of a general issue]
>
> How have you implemented this in the past? I've been working on an API
> for doing it in Turbine, but there's a few gnarly edges that don't feel
> quite right. The implementation is easy, but I really want to get the
> API clean and easy to use.
It's--obviously--always been stack-based, but the specifics of the
implementation has varied based on the application framework. One
trouble spot that I've noticed in the past occurs when the user finds a
way to bypass the screen-stack entirely. This was probably just due to
a inadequate implementation, however. If you like, I'd be happy to take
a look at your API--just fire it over to me directly whenever you feel
it's ready for show and tell. :)
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
