Sean Legassick wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 08:50:06AM -0700, John McNally wrote:
> > I was thinking it might be good to send the response directly for templates
> > which end up with a null layout. Haven't worked out all the details though.
> > And I was wondering if it might be confusing. If a template has a layout,
> > it does not include such things as <html>, <head>, and <body>. However, if
> > no layout is matched, it is expected that the template includes these
> > elements itself.
>
> +1
>
> You could even go further and specify that a template without a layout
> specifies its own content-type (which is how WebMacro standalone works).
> That way these templates need not even be HTML - which would be useful
> for me as I have a need to generate text files under certain
> circumstances (Flash templates).
+1 to both. Should a default content type be provided (perhaps even
settable) for templates that don't specify their content type?
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
