on 7/18/2000 2:37 AM, "Przemyslaw Kozankiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Have you considered to use Log4J in Turbine instead of
> org.apache.turbine.util.Log?
> It is very flexible and has a plenty of possible settings. This library can be
> configured
> from a properties file, has variety of output formats, can write logs to many
> files.
> Even a single log entry can be written to few files. It is very easy to turn
> off all logging
> by a single function call and "in case of emergency" turn it on from the
> properties file
> without recompilation. The library is very fast and when the logging is turned
> off
> the time overhead is insignificant.
>
> Log4J is avaliable at www.log4j.org
I have been a big proponent of log4j, but no one has gone for it. In fact, I
have looked at it in the past for implementation into Turbine and
truthfully, it looked completely over engineered and a bit hard to use.
So, what you should volunteer to do if you are really interested, is to fix
Turbine to define a logging interface and then provide a log4j
implementation of that interface.
thanks,
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
