> I have been a big proponent of log4j, but no one has gone for it. In fact, I
> have looked at it in the past for implementation into Turbine and
> truthfully, it looked completely over engineered and a bit hard to use.
>
> So, what you should volunteer to do if you are really interested, is to fix
> Turbine to define a logging interface and then provide a log4j
> implementation of that interface.
>
Or even better: define a logging service and write a log4j implementation. One
item on my personal TODO list is a centralized logging facility for distributed
Turbine apps, and a logging service would make this much easier.
> thanks,
>
> -jon
>
--
Christopher Elkins
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
