that's a pretty harsh rebuff.
here's a question then:
If you do think it would be REALLY cool, would it be worth rewriting
and releasing under a different license? assuming this is on the up and
up.
--- Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 7/30/2000 10:14 PM, "Douglas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would really appreciate your feedback. I suspect that it could
> > evolve into something useful in the context of projects like yours.
>
> This would be a REALLY cool piece of software if it wasn't under the
> f*cking
> GPL (sorry for the expletives, but I'm tired of dealing with GPL
> software).
>
> I will quote myself:
>
> "A license can ruin a perfectly good piece of software."
>
> In the future, please don't post notices about GPL code around here.
> It just
> isn't welcome. If you are wondering why, read my various rants in the
> archives.
>
> thanks,
>
> -jon
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
