on 8/26/2000 1:49 AM, "Justin Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Velocity has a long way to go to catch up to where WebMacro is now, and for
> what I'm doing today, I need something that is already there. Not something
> that will take another year to materialize.
>
> Note the parser you keep talking about is only 800 lines of code in WM.
> It's a small, small piece of the puzzle and you haven't even begun to
> work on the rest. Caching is also a very small part of it.
Oh master, please tell me more about this puzzle you speak of!
Dude. It is a parser, an introspection engine, a template serializer and a
caching mechanism. We are not talking rocket science here and we have proven
that by re-implementing most of that in 2 weeks time. Another 2 weeks and we
will be 2x as far, if not more because we have the developer resources of
some of the best Java engineers out there.
> Yeah I don't, and I still don't, but I'm not as stuck on the license
> as you are.
Then why did you waste 5 months of my time???????? If you weren't as stuck,
then you should have simply gone with the APL and not wasted everyone's
time.
> I'm sorry you had to put resources into it,
> but right now the right thing to do is merge and move forward together.
Ok. Come merge with the Velocity project.
-jon
--
Scarab -
Java Servlet Based - Open Source
Bug/Issue Tracking System
<http://scarab.tigris.org/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
