"Brekke, Jeff" wrote:
> But, can't we keep the DBBroker/ConnectionPool implementation(s) in
> org.apache.turbine.util.db.pool for
> compatibility, maybe with a deprecated tag?
Sure, +1 on that. Many people are using the pool in standalone
programs, we don't want to break their code right away. Deprecated
tag would also be good, to motivate them to update.
Rafal
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
