John McNally wrote:
>
> Forgive me for being ignorant but where are the Map related classes ending
> up? My guess is that you are leaving them associated with DBBroker. Is
> this true?
>
> DBBroker was born as part of the connection pooling. The association with
> the mapping classes was made later and I was thinking the association should
> be broken and DBBroker assigned to connection pooling duties only, again.
>
> Please clue me in.
I thought that you were hanlding the map classes and have done nothing
with them. I agree that they should be split out...Rafal, can you
expand the scheme that you proposed to cover the map classes as well?
Thanks.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
