> > Maybe I'm in the wrong here, but according to the definition in the
> > package.html file ScreenLoader does not seem to fit into Services.
>
> Yes you misunderstood me Leon. I didn't mean that ScreenLoader should be
> a singleton. ScreenLoader delegates the lookup and loading of Screen
> classes to the AssemblerFactoryManager implementing class, and *this*
> class could be a Service.
>
> It's true that we don't need pluggable implementation, and early
> initialization in this class. But making it a Service won't really
> hurt anything, so I would do it just for the sake of being consistent
> with the rest of the system.
>
OK, I understand. I'll start with a service soon.
~ Leon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
