On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Fedor Karpelevitch wrote: > PS. BTW, what do you guys think about 'officially' redirecting all feature > work from torque to newtorque? What's the status on new torque? If it's fully working then let's move it all into the torque directory and get rid of the old stuff. If everything is cool with new torque then I'll integrate the new torque stuff into the TDK instead of old. jvz. ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- patch for consistent variable/method names in torque Mike Haberman
- Re: patch for consistent variable/method names in ... Jason van Zyl
- Re: patch for consistent variable/method names in ... Fedor Karpelevitch
- Re: patch for consistent variable/method names... Jason van Zyl
- NewTorque Jason van Zyl
- NewTorque Jason van Zyl
- Re: NewTorque Leon Messerschmidt
- Re: NewTorque Jason van Zyl
- Re: NewTorque Leon Messerschmidt
- The Torques Jason van Zyl
- Removing non-torque OM generators Jason van Zyl
- [ANN] Torque 1.1a6 Jason van Zyl
- Re: [ANN] Torque 1.1a6 Rafal Krzewski
- Samples in Turbine codebase Jason van Zyl
- Re: Samples in Turbine codebase Christopher Elkins
