Yep, the point of my email was that I was getting tired fixing them. :-)
Could you please go over ALL of that security code again to make sure I
didn't miss anything and that you haven't missed anything else? So far, we
have missing sync methods, missing unlocks and a few general missing
methods (in the User stuff reported by others). :-)
-jon
> Rafal Krzewski wrote:
> > Only the methods that use lockExclusive/unlockExclusive must be
> > synchronized.
> > Those using lockShared/unlockShared mustn't.
> >
> > There were indeed some missing unlocks, but only unlockExclusive()s that
> > actually do nothing. Still, you have a point here.
> >
> > I'm fixing it now.
>
> Uh, I see you fixed that alreay.
> 100% valid changes, thanks.
>
> Rafal
>
> --
> Rafal Krzewski
> Senior Internet Developer
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Scarab -
Java Servlet Based - Open Source
Bug/Issue Tracking System
<http://scarab.tigris.org/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
