on 1/23/01 10:46 AM, "Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe this reflects a problem with the traditional
> meaning for "user" and "group". Perhaps a better
> name for Turbine's "group" concept would be
> "system", which would reflect the idea that there
> may be several "systems" sharing the same
> user DB. I'm not proposing to change things, I'm
> just pointing out a possible reason for this
> recurring question.
Actually, it should be something like:
Project_Group (this is the renamed current "GROUP")
User_Group (this is a new table)
There is a need for two different sets of groupings (including user
grouping).
-jon
--
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
