On 23 Jan 2001 14:46:20 -0400, Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo wrote:
> Maybe this reflects a problem with the traditional
> meaning for "user" and "group". Perhaps a better
> name for Turbine's "group" concept would be
> "system", which would reflect the idea that there
> may be several "systems" sharing the same
> user DB. I'm not proposing to change things, I'm
> just pointing out a possible reason for this
> recurring question.
>From a newbie Turbine user's point of view, I think the "group"
denomination is very confusing. It takes a while until you realize that
it means more something like "subsystem", "area" or "partition". This
supposing I'm understanding it right :-).
Cheers,
Arkaitz.
> > Rafal
>
>
> --
> Gonzalo A. Diethelm
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
