On 1/18/07, Adam Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1.0/RoughDocs is chock full of links to all kinds of interesting things. (good job, everyone!) Does anyone have information on the approval process that we are going to use to promote docs out of this section and into the main documentation?
If the code on the page is tested and is up to snuff as far as writing goes, mark it official, lock it down, move it out of the RoughDocs namespace, and link it in the 1.0 index. I trust the judgment of the people who have editor permissions to maintain quality in official docs. The intention of RoughDocs was always to be a temporary home for documents that are works-in-progress. Once they are finished, there's not much use in keeping them there. If you'd like discussion about something (e.g. you'd like the group to copy edit a particular RoughDoc), feel free to post it, but I'd rather not make the promotion process any more work than it has to be. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Docs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-docs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
