Adam Jones schrieb:
1.0/RoughDocs is chock full of links to all kinds of interesting things. (good job, everyone!) Does anyone have information on the approval process that we are going to use to promote docs out of this section and into the main documentation? I would be happy with just posting the relevant part of the URL in the title and having a discussion here. Comments, questions, decrees of absolute stupidity?
There is also the opposite case where there are docs directly under the 1.0 namespace and linked from http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0 that are still a bit rough and need some work. Examples: http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/AlternativeAJAXLibraries http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/Deployment http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/DevStatus (Grammar) http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/AlternativeComponents (Grammar) http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/TGInfo (does not exist) The whole "For Cleanup/Reorg" section These should be moved to 1.0/RoughDocs. All this moving around of pages makes me wonder, if putting new pages under the 1.0/RoughDocs namespace is such a good idea. Shouldn't it be enough to only link them from http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/RoughDocs and mark them with Status: Draft but have them under the 1.0 namespace directly? Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Docs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-docs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
