I wanted to get some second opinions on this. FastData is somewhat groovy, but people are likely to quickly become disenchanted with it because it doesn't have enough customization hooks. I'm wondering if we should put FastData in a separate package until it's matured more. Doing that may give us a bit more freedom-to-hack as FastData can remain "alpha" while TurboGears itself is "stable".
I'm also wondering about the merits of having TurboGears itself built of multiple packages. That's a freedom that setuptools gives us that we wouldn't have otherwise. It could open the door to others being able to use and build on tools that we've created. (This change would not make TurboGears appear differently to TG users... installing TurboGears would get all of the core packages. FastData wouldn't be one of the core packages at this point.) Kevin -- Kevin Dangoor Author of the Zesty News RSS newsreader email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] company: http://www.BlazingThings.com blog: http://www.BlueSkyOnMars.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
