+1 I haven't thought much about this, but maybe could each tool in the Toolbox be a package on it's own (individual release cycle), the Toolbox could instead be kind of a package manager you could use to see the packages you currently have in your system and browse among TG plugins and tools at the CheeseShop performing downloads, installs and upgrades. Cheers Ronald
On Apr 3, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Kevin Dangoor wrote: > > I wanted to get some second opinions on this. > > FastData is somewhat groovy, but people are likely to quickly become > disenchanted with it because it doesn't have enough customization > hooks. I'm wondering if we should put FastData in a separate package > until it's matured more. Doing that may give us a bit more > freedom-to-hack as FastData can remain "alpha" while TurboGears itself > is "stable". > > I'm also wondering about the merits of having TurboGears itself built > of multiple packages. That's a freedom that setuptools gives us that > we wouldn't have otherwise. It could open the door to others being > able to use and build on tools that we've created. (This change would > not make TurboGears appear differently to TG users... installing > TurboGears would get all of the core packages. FastData wouldn't be > one of the core packages at this point.) > > Kevin > > -- > Kevin Dangoor > Author of the Zesty News RSS newsreader > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > company: http://www.BlazingThings.com > blog: http://www.BlueSkyOnMars.com > > > ________________________________ Ronald Jaramillo mail: ronald AT checkandshare DOT com blog: http://www.checkandshare.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
