On Mon, 2008-24-03 at 15:45 -0400, Mark Ramm wrote: > > I think we should make ToscaWidget for each of the css frameworks and > > then have good documentation about how to implement the widget site- > > wide. Site-wide implementation is not too hard, all a developer would > > need to do is modify their BaseController to use the widget, and then > > modify their master.html to display said widget. > > That makes good sense -- we should cover CSS frameworks like we do > javascript frameworks -- by providing widgets and documentation. > > But if our user registration module, and form stuff could depend on a > CSS framework, that might make it easier to have very good looking > output by default. > > I don't know my way around the CSS framework world enough to pick one, > thought he two I mentioned in my e-mail seem to be the most popular -- > and they both provide web-based tools to customize the framework > somewhat....
I think a library of sample/examples to go with the widgets would be more productive than a framework and I could actually contribute some "best practices bologna" to that. ;-) >From what I've read/heard, the css frameworks just aren't that good, they're not like jQuery or Ext or anything. I don't think the relationship is the same or something, dunno. I could be wrong ... Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
